www.flickr.com
|
should i get one for my new build, pros and cons? thanks.
yes. they're amazing and so smoooootthhhhhh.
best headset available today. the con is obviously the price.
Sure if you want the bling factor. I'm putting one on my new build. That said my $25 cane creek is still super smooth after 3 years of year round commuting.
I dont own one and I do want one but I would stick with Cane Creek unless your frame is worth a significant amount. No use putting diamonds on a piece of lead.
Another plus is they are made here and they support the biking here pretty well.
there like 160 right?
its gonna be a pake
they have a ten year guarantee also if i'm correct, well the bearings.
someone correct me if i'm wrong.
and like d3fold said, the bling factor is there too since you can get them colored.
i just want a black one
i got mine for 144 at bike central cause they had to order it (color) haha
but veloshop has them for $124 for 1" and $129 for 1 1/8"
yung jeezy pdx:there like 160 right?
$130-$180
There about $125
never had a problem with mine ever. Had a couple cane creeks and FSA's that got wobbly on me.
Personally on a Pake I wouldnt put a CK on it. But its your money.
krystenr:yung jeezy pdx:there like 160 right?
$130-$180
180 wow don't know where you're shopping. ha not even bike central has them for that much.
its either that or an fsa orbit x. i dont know.
go with the king
What kind of improvement will you get out of an expensive headset? I've been rocking cheap cane creek headsets for years now and have never really thought about it.
i dont know, i just thought they might be better. my cane creek on my pista is done for.
thats why i asked
yeah, its just one of those things. King, Like Phil, is not only hip n shit, but both are tried and true. Anyone, seriously, will agree that they are very very solid and will last forever. They are a bit pricy but if you want to justify it, think of the investment. as with any part it'll be there even when you buy some super expensive frame in the future. You'll already be set with your headset.
That being said, make sure if its threadless you will want to be riding threadless for a long time and same for threaded. its hard to tell but it'd suck to switch frames and be left with an unusable headset.
So is the goodness mainly in how long it will last?
i think that and quality.
shit, yeah, but also the smoothness of the finest swiss butter fresh from the cow.
went a little to far there, but the kings are a perfect headset in my opinion. nothing more, nothing less.
unless you get the limited run black with etched logos for 600+ dollars.
The only ones that are more than the usual $125 or $130 is the SteelSet ($160ish), the Ti NoThreadSet ($200+) and the 1.5" platform about ($160).
I put a SteelSet on my DH bike - the cups on those go deep into the headtube. 1.5" vs the normal .75". It better resists ovalization of the headtube for durability when you are riding like Tom LaMarche.
alex:So is the goodness mainly in how long it will last?
better bearing, manufacturing tolerances and availability of colors. they charge a premium versus other brands like CC or FSA because they are manufactured in Portland and they practice green manufacturing processes.
the bearings themselves are made overseas, same as the bearings in other headsets. says so right on the side of the bearing.
The nicer FSA headsets are decent and have improved a lot over the years, but king last forever.
white folks:the bearings themselves are made overseas, same as the bearings in other headsets. says so right on the side of the bearing.
Dude, those bearings are made out of gnome testicles. From the Cascades.
Sometimes I wonder where you get your information from.
when they say that the bearing sets themselves are made here, I swallow hard.Even Phil Wood has the sense to have the Big Bad Globo-Bearing Co. make his bearings to spec. I mean Dana Corp was the last US ball and roller bearing maker of any consequence and they closed shop in like 03. So what exactly are they making? If they are making the races...I stand corrected. That would explain why they cost what they do. I sent off an e-mail to them to find out.
as far as where my knowledge comes from, in this particular instance, meaning bearings, I used to do the hardware ordering for a machine shop I managed. Their catalog had nice glossy pics and you could cross reference by the bearing model number, the ISO sizing number, or the product part number. The bearing model number is laser etched on one of the non-working surfaces, right next to the origin code.
I'll post here with what I hear back from CK, but I gotta cut it out with my Mr. Know-It-All-Shit, it's hard to spell this good for this many consecutive posts. Plus I sound like my dorky engineer dad.
I've got them on 3 of my bikes and I love them, but admittedly they are probably more expensive then they are worth. In the old days they were the way to go because they last forever and others didn't. It ended up being cheaper in the long run. These days most $30-$50 headsets will last a long time as well.
Personally, I like the fact that they are here in PDX and they pay their employees a living wage (including healthcare). They also practice as a green manufacturing processes as possible and really do support alot of causes in Portland (local races like Cross crusade, PDX short track, trail maintenance, fund raisers, etc. That means a lot to me and makes it worth the extra money. (My cross bikes race wheels have King Hubs as well). Plus it takes the sting out knowing that they truly are the best you can get.
Dude putting a CK on a Pake? Yeah, that's putting diamonds on lead like the guy above said. You're getting the cheapest entry level track frame... and then throwing the most expensive headset on it?
I'm gonna go ahead and veer away from popular opinion in this thread and say it's a no go. You won't notice a single difference between the CK and a $60 headset when riding the bike, and if you haven't beat your bike to shit 3 years later, the $60 will likely still be cruising.
my pake's bought to be ballin, just wait and see. no chris king for me, i gotta save my money for teh arrospokezzzz
Real ballers roll Tri-Spokes... :)
i wish i had the money to buy one. i told jonah id buy him a mercier frame for his.
for best results make sure you face your head tube for use with the ck. (face - remove a small amount of material to ensure planarity. done with a freakin expensive tool)
stumptown:Dude putting a CK on a Pake? Yeah, that's putting diamonds on lead like the guy above said. You're getting the cheapest entry level track frame... and then throwing the most expensive headset on it?
I'm gonna go ahead and veer away from popular opinion in this thread and say it's a no go. You won't notice a single difference between the CK and a $60 headset when riding the bike, and if you haven't beat your bike to shit 3 years later, the $60 will likely still be cruising.
i got a brassknuckle, with king headset, is that the same. it's one of those things that say for example something happens to your frame you can still take that headset with, as with others but at least it's gonna last. and i won't lie my headset is pink to match, but i'm hard on my shit so i don't feel like having to constantly replace things, in the past three years i've gone through 3 cheap headsets (around $40 ones i believe) . so i'll stick with the better.
white folks:when they say that the bearing sets themselves are made here, I swallow hard.Even Phil Wood has the sense to have the Big Bad Globo-Bearing Co. make his bearings to spec. I mean Dana Corp was the last US ball and roller bearing maker of any consequence and they closed shop in like 03. So what exactly are they making? If they are making the races...I stand corrected. That would explain why they cost what they do. I sent off an e-mail to them to find out.
as far as where my knowledge comes from, in this particular instance, meaning bearings, I used to do the hardware ordering for a machine shop I managed. Their catalog had nice glossy pics and you could cross reference by the bearing model number, the ISO sizing number, or the product part number. The bearing model number is laser etched on one of the non-working surfaces, right next to the origin code.
I'll post here with what I hear back from CK, but I gotta cut it out with my Mr. Know-It-All-Shit, it's hard to spell this good for this many consecutive posts. Plus I sound like my dorky engineer dad.
No testicles? Dang, I been seriously misled.
it's your money...
but i would just go with a cane creek or something on a pake. why a pake, if you don't mind my asking? they're just a cheap straight gauge tubing that looks pretty cool. i was into them before i learned more about their build.
for instance, i ended up, through an incredible trade, with a steamroller, which at least has a main triangle that's double butted. straight gauge tubing is strange to me. it seems too unresponsive. and f-ing heavy.
but whatever. i'm thinking of looking into those scattantes.
at any rate, your king headset would in theory be worth more than your frame. go with the cane creek. or salsa or something.
jeezy, tell me again why your getting the pake over a TT? compared to the TT the pake is a tank weight wise and costs just as much if not more $$. WTF? srsly?
if you havent seen a TT, come over and peep ours, it's hella light.
hella.
from what I hear it's a question of sizing, plus he may or may not be getting a deal
as for the headset, if you want go for CK, i wouldn't. I've had a shimano 105 headset that cost probably 50 or 60 and is going strong almost 3 years later.
regarding top shelf headset on bottom shelf frame, fuck it. frames hold all your parts together. you can always transfer parts onto different frames later on.
true, zelah, but i just don't like taking parts on and off. a headset is no big deal, but for instance every time you reapply a crank to a spindle, it further stretches the machined hole. gross. get your mind out of the gutter.
yeah i wouldn't make a habit of it, but its a possibility.
Kilo TT is a way better deal than a Pake on all fronts... why pay the same $$$ for a heavier frame vs. a tried and true one? I've beaten the shit out of my KHS (same frame as Kilo TT), got hit by a car (mostly threw my rear rim out of true, frame was checked for alignment issues and is still straight as an arrow), worked a job on it hauling up to 50 pounds of food on the rear basket (probably not something the frame was designed for), ridden a full winter on it, banged it up plenty hard, it's holding along fine. They're solid frames, they'll build up ~19-21lb depending on the mostly on the wheelset (in your case you'll be pushing the heavy end of the scale with that AnchorSpoke(tm)), and they're priced really nice. Do ittt.
weltall82:true, zelah, but i just don't like taking parts on and off. a headset is no big deal, but for instance every time you reapply a crank to a spindle, it further stretches the machined hole. gross. get your mind out of the gutter.
As for stretching the whole, not really true, just make sure you have the right interface on both crank & spindle...ie JIS vs ISO. Now headset getting that on and for ultimate performance, gotta be sure that the cups seat perpendicular to the axis of the head tube (reason for facing) and that the bearings seat nice for ultimate smoothness / life.
reasons for a pake:
kilo tt is not going to fit me right. 50 cm is the right top tube lengh but too low of a seat tube. 53 is too long of a toptube and the right seat tube. im also getting on ebcause the bike shop i work at can get them for me cheap. im really having second thoughts now though. fuck.
and isnt it tange tubing?
Tange is the name of the company that make that steel tube.
A Pake is really not that bad, yeah it is "waterpipe" or "homedepot" tube as some people have mentioned, but it's still a fine bike, plus your getting a deal on it, so don't sweat it.
What are you using it for? a street fixie or to race at the track?
Also, all in all - don't worry about the seat tube length, focus more on the effective top tube length, sometimes referred to as horizontal tt length, this is what will ultimately determine your comfort on the bike.
im pretty sure its tange 4130 maybe? street and maybe track use. the thing about the seat tube is that i like a really high seat post so i dont wnat the seta to be extra high if i got the mercier.
4130 refers to the grade of steel and material properties, 4130 has been around for ever, steel. Tange is the manu who makes the tubes out of 4130 that are welded together to make your Pake Frame.
Google steel 4130 if you want to see the properties. It's certainly not the lightest or heaviest, but many other processes affect how light a frameset is.
Not sure I get you on the seat height thing. If you know your effective top tube, this will be based on how relaxed or how aggressive you want your position on your bikeand also the frames geometry ie sloping top tube will depend on how much seat tube is showing. If that makes sense... garble :)